-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 09:52:04AM -0500, Christian Schaller wrote: > So to summarize the proposal. > > * Fedora will continue to not ship non-free software and as part of that will continue to only default to free software. This is a must. > * We will add the needed metadata to the Software installer to give our users the freedom to choose to install legally cleared 3rd party software - From a desire to push FOSS solutions I don't like making it easy to use non-free solutions where free solutions are available. It would seem that we are endorsing these non-FOSS solutions which could also be a problem. How does a project get into your non-free solution? Why would one be rejected from being included? We'd need to publish the rules of engagement and I'd want to see those rules before checking off on this. - -- Eric - -------------------------------------------------- Eric "Sparks" Christensen Fedora Project sparks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx - sparks@xxxxxxxxxx 097C 82C3 52DF C64A 50C2 E3A3 8076 ABDE 024B B3D1 - -------------------------------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQGcBAEBCgAGBQJS3pVIAAoJEB/kgVGp2CYvUwIL/ApCpDlXFlqSXO04Lq3DgiM3 XzJMzZmsPeOOSyvmk+lf5yfoiQWaNtoe9vAawKZjckFwm7r2LR0/axwxFZDLXjTk y9x4ygBNhl4dtWK0CMYDemXqQ0sMzhS/b8Avu4AHGHk5QRz7LV31N9YO7S4++LTn ojU25raJZ9AENFDsA50kRR5nLT3NtuGSbL9R6scnsowrdRFh1M51lc07Ia+7B8Ad ArG1Ix7obKf/FC0O+OmO5klUBMfnJGoE0WOS0hLTblsY3yP4B48j+Yl6uazVJq6v 0HmutfBzACsZ54Ifm5F0wkvxNcN7MnqguHFJdB4G3Ygh3XMzeOEL6M3zIMocdvaP yqvEJJkkOBuWAk3VYnqWWdbLflzWEOX7UEFre4TKzvRSXsou/ZiVCCFZP674ndJJ l+nttOrZh30nGyhfQibEFngi9ShV0KstVR62yv+lvwwuY3ucA71ef5jcFrBY+Jtg 1Fk6DdiK7BWRBV/TlgDbyMoKTIoMcTTzR3rXbs08Yg== =pIGZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
