+1
On Dec 10, 2013 3:23 AM, "Jaroslav Reznik" <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > Hi board,
> >
> > according to the schedule [1] the election wrangler should have been
> > picked a month ago. So far this hasn't happened, this is why I throw my
> > hat into the ring.
>
> Hi Christoph,
> I'm more than happy to see a volunteer - with inode and Ankur, we were
> thinking who could step into.
>
> Elections schedule in the main schedule is not relevant, Ankur did his
> own schedule (to make it easier for him) and it is PITA to sync it. It's
> removed from future schedules (but not F20 one).
>
> And where should elections aim? The agreement with FESCo is, that
> elections will be held in the end of January, to be coordinated with
> the multi product deadline. So old FESCo is going to be in charge by
> this time (for continuity). Looking on the current list of blockers,
> we're even not going to do anything exceptional to that 30 days after
> release rule as there's possibility of F20 slip to January.
>
> > Please confirm you are fine with me going ahead.
>
> Go ahead, we will be in touch for scheduling questions but this time
> you have pretty free hands to do whatever you want :).
>
> Jaroslav
>
> > Best regards,
> > Christoph
> >
> > [1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-20/f-20-elections.html
_______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
