On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > One thing Robyn's email causes me to think about, however, is to make it > clear how the members of this fpl cabinet would be selected. I think the > answer is "each group sending a representative gets to decide how" but > without being explicit some people might assume they're all elected or some > other uniform process. So the original email said: "Each of those committees, which clearly have a large stake and vested interest in Fedora succeeding, would chose one member to appoint to their respective Board seat. That person would be responsible for their group's interaction with the Board and the other groups." Is that not sufficient? Or is the "gets to decide how" part something you think needs to be explicitly mentioned? I mean, we can but it seemed pretty clear to me the group doing the appointing would decide. Otherwise how would they be able to appoint? josh _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
