On 09.09.2013 15:57, Josh Boyer wrote: > Or have I done the impossible? Have I proposed something that is > either universally agreeable or universally hated? Seems unlikely. good to ask again, seems people are busy with non-governance work Normaly i do not respond to Fedora Governance discussions anymore but you pointed out something very important, that i felt necessary since a long time - but was never able to bring it up as such a well structured proposal like yours! From my time in the board and as the famsco chair i can say the communication between the other governance bodies inside Fedora would prosper with a more formalized approach. I second the idea to have liasons to the Board from other governance bodies - e.g. elected chairs of famsco, fesco become board members with their elections ... informal Leaders, like Marketing or Design similar ... cu Joerg -- Joerg (kital) Simon jsimon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JoergSimon http://kitall.blogspot.com Key Fingerprint: 3691 0989 2DCA 58A2 8D1F 2CAC C823 558E 5B5B 5688
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
