On 09/06/2013 02:42 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>The <open> seat could be anything. I don't have a clear group that
>should fill it. Maybe it can be appointed to gain valuable insight in
>specific areas (though we can always just ask for that insight
>anyway). Maybe it could be a representative from the new Product
>Workgroups that are being formed.
>
Being a little more flexible with <open> might be interesting. Instead of
just a single seat, pull in a representative from the groups needed for
solving what the current project problems are. Don't want to derail this
with something radical if this is a controversial idea, though.
Actually this makes much sense and might be used to pull in
representative from the sub-communities if necessary and solve the bit
that atleast I was unsure about.
( not that I can currently think of any reason why that should become
necessary but at least the option to do so would be there )
So +1 to this and Josh's proposal.
JBG
_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
