Re: Approving Spins

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 16:45:02 -0500,
  "Eric H. Christensen" <sparks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

During today's Board meeting we were asked to approve four spins and their trademark usage.  I'm not sure why we have to approve the spins themselves outside of the trademark usage since we don't individually approve other works from other SIGs (documentation, artwork, swag, etc).  This seems to be a new rule (within the last couple of years) and I'm currently trying to determine exactly when this came about and why.

That said, I'd like to abolish this rule.  It doesn't make sense to selectively approve what one SIG does.

Note that the Spins SIG is dysfunctional. Regular meetings ceased a long time ago. A few people help out with different aspects of it, but there really isn't a coherent group to make approval decisions. Christoph (the wrangler) seems to be pretty busy with other stuff, but he might be able to make a sanity check and a recommendation.
_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux