On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 2:27 PM, inode0 <inode0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Máirín Duffy <duffy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 14:18 -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: >>> The thing is - we have not agreed on any of these suggestions and as >>> always - suddenly was too late to take an action as there are rules >>> when the elections should be started... And we need strong agreement >>> within community, that means a strong proposal. And of course, we're >>> still open for any suggestions/proposals. >> >> Are there too many suggestions, then? Is asking for more proposals going >> to be productive, if so? > > I wonder if the board is waiting for a proposal to emerge from all the > ideas floated so far that the community supports and those involved in > making proposals are waiting for the board to choose one? > > What really needs to happen here for us to make progress? > > John Not to throw any more flame on the fire, but I really prefer the current method (the one we've used since Fedora's inception). I really dislike the direction this has taken. The current mechanism works just fine for most folks, or they don't care. I think spinning our wheels on a decision to move forward is probably more one of 'why are we doing this again?' syndrome. I'm not sure the connotation analysis that started this conversation really represented the feelings of everyone in the Fedora community. It certainly didn't for me. That said, I'm not here to start a flame war or say that a new method shouldn't happen. I'm more interested in just keeping the status quo here, since it's fun for those who participate and otherwise not very painful from my point of view. Clint _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
