On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Minutes: > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-09-26/fedora_board.2012-09-26-18.30.html > Minutes (text): > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-09-26/fedora_board.2012-09-26-18.30.txt > Log: > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-09-26/fedora_board.2012-09-26-18.30.log.html > > ===================================== > #fedora-meeting: Fedora Board Meeting > ===================================== > > > Meeting started by Sparks at 18:30:01 UTC. The full logs are available > at > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-09-26/fedora_board.2012-09-26-18.30.log.html > . > > > > Meeting summary > --------------- > * Roll Call (Sparks, 18:30:28) > * ke4qqq will not be here due to $dayjob requirements (Sparks, > 18:31:32) > * rbergeron is somewhere and the Internets are somewhere else > (Sparks, 18:32:58) > * Sparks, abadger1999, cwickert, gholms, inode0, and jreznik are in > attendance. (Sparks, 18:36:18) > > * Agenda (Sparks, 18:36:48) > > * Announcements (Sparks, 18:37:40) > * Next Public Board IRC Meeting time/date confirmation: Wednesday, > October 10, 2012 @ 18:30 UTC (Sparks, 18:38:36) > > * Open Q&A (Sparks, 18:39:26) > > * Ticket #141: Keep better, open records of how Board members vote on > issues (Sparks, 18:41:48) > * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/board/ticket/141 (Sparks, 18:41:55) > * IDEA: Have a new trac instance for things that can be discussed in > public. (Sparks, 18:51:12) > * LINK: http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/PrivateCommentPlugin (gholms, > 18:54:38) > * ACTION: cwickert to work with nirik to see if the Trac > PrivateCommentPlugin is a viable solution and bring back the results > to the next Board meeting. (Sparks, 18:58:19) > * IDEA: Have a new board-public mailing list. This list should either > be moderated by board members or not open for posting (possibly that > also means subscription... not sure what mailman2 allows). Archives > are definitely public. Unless a discussion needs to be private, > discussion should occur here. (Sparks, 19:02:13) Isn't that what the advisory-board list is for? I'm not sure a 3rd list is going to fix the problem. > * The goal of the board-public list would be for board members to be > able to carry on public conversations with minimal distractions that > currently occur on the board-private list (gholms, 19:06:14) > * IDEA: We keep the lists the way they are now and really start using > the advisory-list more. (Sparks, 19:30:44) > * 4 +1, 1 0, 1 -1 (Sparks, 19:33:42) > > * Release naming status (Sparks, 19:39:35) > * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/board/ticket/146 (jreznik, > 19:41:24) > > * Fedora 19 naming process (cwickert, 19:41:53) > * AGREED: The F19 naming will go as normal and a yet-to-be-determined > naming schema will be used for F20 (Sparks, 19:52:30) > > * Open Q&A (Sparks, 19:53:35) > * ACTION: everyone on the board should consider ticket 145 for next > week's meeting (cwickert, 19:56:15) > > Meeting ended at 19:59:14 UTC. > > _______________________________________________ > advisory-board mailing list > advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
