----- Original Message ----- > On 06/13/2012 11:26 AM, inode0 wrote: > > Quite the contrary I think it is obvious that eligible voters and > > nominees should not be the same for all groups. You are only I > > suppose > > talking about the Board, FESCo, and FAmSCo but there are other > > governance bodies and they are working well enough without any > > other > > group butting into their business. > > The only one I'm referring to are the Board, FESCo, and FAmSCo since > those are the only once I'm aware of.. > > In QA we for example have no need to have a governing body ( hence we > dont have one ) and same thing should apply for other community wide > services like design and releng from my pov view. > > Could you elaborate on which other governing bodies exist? SIGs? And even some SIGs could have more structures. Even in KDE SIG we had FKDESCo long time ago :) With own rules, self established but we forgot it already. R. > JBG > _______________________________________________ > advisory-board mailing list > advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
