----- Original Message ----- > The only way to find out is to implement it and measure the outcome > then > revisit the proposal after at least what three release cycles? > > We have a "fail safe" if there wont be enough nominees for any > governing > body elections and that is the FPL can fill the seats and those can > be > filled in with anyone including individuals that either are with the > same company ( if we would implement the corporate restriction > proposal > ) What are these corporate restrictions? Do we have such problem? Currently only FPL is appointed by a company (Red Hat in this case) and I'm not sure other corporations are involved or people to other bodies are appointed by a corporation. R. > or if an individual has reached the limit on how many terms he can > sit > within a given governing body ( limit number of terms/consecutive > terms > proposal ) or if it's an individual that is currently sitting in a > governing body ( limit individual to being only able to serve in a > single governing body at a time proposal ). > > In essence whomever the FPL appoints supersedes any election rules we > might have put in place should the need for him to arise to start > appointing people in the first place. > > JBG > _______________________________________________ > advisory-board mailing list > advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
