On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 04/19/2012 08:03 AM, Ben Williams wrote: >> >> those same people voted to change the Election Rules therefore ALL >> members of FAmsco Seats should be open for this election and be done > > > The whole point of the election rules change(s) was to stagger replacements, > no? That is one of the important points, there are other concerns addressed by the changes too (for example, the composition of the electorate and the filling of mid-term vacant seats). The contention in a nutshell is over the decision to apply the new rules retroactively to the previous election results rather than just adopt the new rules and have them govern the conduct of elections following their adoption. We end up having staggered elections no matter which option is chosen. John _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
