On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:24:19AM -0400, Pam Chestek wrote: > On 4/10/2012 1:38 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:53:15AM -0500, inode0 wrote: > >> People are starting to reasonably ask questions about what is going on > >> with this election now. The published schedule shows that we are > >> supposed to be in the middle of the voting step now but we don't seem > >> to have started it yet. > >> > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Name_suggestions_for_Fedora_18#Naming_Schedule > >> > >> Has the list been dealt with by the Board at this point? Has the > >> result been passed on for legal review yet? > >> > > The names were vetted by the Board the day after the submissions closed > > (March 28). > > > > The names are currently being vetted by Legal. Since Legal review is > > a blackbox, we don't know precisely when we'll get the vetted list of names > > back. > > > >> Can we change the wiki to indicate the delay so folks stop trying to vote now? > >> > > I've updated the page to say what's been done and which step we're delayed > > on. > > > > -Toshio > > > Hey guys, that was kind of unkind not telling the whole story, > particularly since it was reported in the news. We were given the names > on April 3, not 30 March that was listed on the schedule. I also told > Robyn that it generally takes a week, and Friday was a holiday. Erin is > sending out the results now. > Oops... sorry. I was unaware of hte whole story. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpfgz9bO99NU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
