Em Seg, 2012-02-20 às 19:42 -0600, inode0 escreveu: > I don't have a suggestion about a criterion for who decides but I do > have one for how they decide and that is explained in our current > travel subsidy guidelines here: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Sponsoring_event_attendees > > It doesn't need to be a separate group who does this, it could be the > same group who is making the funding decisions. I just think we'd do a > better job if we made one pass through all the requests individually > before as a group evaluating them one at a time. > > Here is one possible way I have imagined this working. Let's say there > are 5 contributors involved in making the decisions. We clean out the > special cases that we agree on first. Then with the rest we each rank > them in some range (say 1 to 3 with 1 being high value, 2 being very > high value, and 3 being unbelievably Beefy Miracle with extra relish > value). Sum up the individual rankings and as a group work through all > the requests in the order this produces. (Probably still need wiggle > room in the process but that is the general idea.) That is a good suggestion. I like this being a result of a group voting, it gives legitimacy to the process. In addition, a 1-3 or 1-5 range would give us a more granular vision than just a +1 or -1, like we currently do in subsidy meetings. I would like to hear the opinions and experiences of other FAmSCo members in order to improve this process. A meeting ticket was opened for that. -- Igor Pires Soares Fedora Ambassador (Brazil) - Member of FAmSCo Fedora I18N/L10N QA https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Igor _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
