On 01/26/2012 08:50 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOT!Since we didn't get to the Board member tasks at yesterday's meeting, jsmith suggested that the Board members send the goals they've selected (if they've done so already) to the mailing list to start discussion. I've talked to rbergeron and decided to take the task of fixing the Feature Process. We've known for a long time that the Feature Process provides a useful service but at the expense of aggravating the people implementing features [sometimes unnecessarily], annoying the people deciding what's a feature [often unnecessarily], and without always achieving the collaboration needed to make release happen without slippage and/or last minute fixing of feature-driven brokenness [seems like at least every other release]. These and other problems were collected by rbergeron and other impacted Fedora contributors on: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fixing_features I'll be working on taking those identified problems and turning out a new Feature Policy that FESCo can approve which addresses those issues. Oh, sorry, got overly excited there for a minute. Next steps? Timeline? Where is communication going to happen? :) I know it's been mentioned at times that having a FAD to tackle this at some stage might be faster/higher-bandwidth, but I leave that ball in your court. Thanks, Toshio, for taking this one on. :) -robyn -Toshio_______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board |
_______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
