On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Something that was brought up at the last fesco meeting is that > fesco membership is currently restricted to members of the packaging > group. That's arguably overly restrictive - fesco is intended to be the > body with technical oversight over the entire project, not merely > packaging, and in that situation it seems odd to restrict membership to > a subset of the people under fesco's pervue. > > There's a few things we can do here. We can keep the status quo. We can > add new groups such as qa. Or we can open it to the entire project and > just assume that the electorate will ensure that nobody inappropriate > gets elected. > > Anyone have opinions on what we should be doing here? Sounds reasonable to me, is changes to FESCo something that needs to be approved by the Board? (adding f-a-b mailing list for clarification). Peter _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
