Re: Improving the Spins process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Well, they're important becasue they have been the defined products that
> we produce, outside of even the Spins process. (They're actually referred to
> in the spins process as being separate bases that Spins can build on.)

While I agree that this is historically true, and had merit at some
point, I think that everything that we produce is in reality a "spin".
Either a spin used for installation, or a live spin. The reason that I
say this is that everything is produced with the same tools. Why not
have it use the same process - at a technical level, the products
aren't at all different.

> Also, 'make sure the design team is happy with the artwork'? Maybe I'm
> missing something, but I don't see that in the spins process anywhere as
> something that spins go through.

While I don't see it on the page now that I look, I had been under the
impression that design team signoff was part of the process.
_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux