On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Jared K. Smith <jsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2) While discussing some of the shortcomings of using wiki categories > to track progress on Spins, we also talked about the Features process > and how it too might benefit from using a ticketing system to track > progress of features. As I understand it, Robyn (as the Fedora > Program Manager) already opens a FESCo ticket for each feature (so > that it's on the FESCo agenda), but uses wiki categories to track the > state (proposed, accepted, rejected, etc.) of each feature. Is there > interest in moving the features process over to using tickets for > keeping track of the feature state, and keeping the discussion about > the feature in one easy-to-find location, rather than having it > scattered across talk pages, wiki pages, and FESCo meeting minutes? > I believe and practice the use of a tracking system for my work everyday, is a great thing to have, im a heavy redmine user and people that know me personally is aware about this fact. I honestly believes all those process can better tracked, documented, and structured using such kind of integrated tools instead of trying to do it by combining wiki + mailing + trac (plus the coding needed to integrate them, it also makes it easier to maintain). I wish the actual trac instance gets updated sometime soon and get all those nice features i already enjoy with redmine (such as in rpmdev.proyectofedora.org - latam projects). -- Ing.Guillermo Gomez S. Fedora Board Member A4 http://gomix.fedora-ve.org << this is a redmine just in case u never visited my site previously... http://www.neotechgw.com _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
