On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 01:38:13AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > I would also note that FPCA designates the Fedora Board > with the authority to change the default license but Fedora Board > doesn't have any clear rules on the decision making process and with the > Fedora Board Chair having veto power, it essentially transfers control > of this decision to Red Hat. Given the nature of the FPCA - the central idea is the default license - it becomes necessary (or at least desirable) to have some way of instituting a new default license in the future, without necessarily issuing a new version of the FPCA. Perhaps the Fedora Board should at some point specify such "clear rules on the decisionmaking process". I wouldn't expect the Board to consider it a priority, since the selection of a new default license is likely to be an extremely rare event. - RF _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board