On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 06:17, Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > While I do think this proposal is a step into the right direction, I > still have some questions and concerns. > > Dienstag, den 12.04.2011, 11:11 -0600 schrieb Stephen John Smoogen: >> 0) The Board will appoint SIG's that they think are appropriate for >> various trademark approvals. > > Only once or per-spin? I was thinking per "class" of items. So spins might be X,Y,Z and system images (ec2 images, etc) might be X,Y,A >> 1) Each appointed SIG should create a checklist or SOP for Item approval > I proposed this as a generic outline for trademark approvals. Item is meant to cover "digital system images" of their multiple types not chicken sandwiches. > And isn't using the ticket system a bit overkill? Say we have 20 items > to check by 10 different SIGs, this means we have 20 tickets, right? > With the current privacy level of the board's trac, we cannot have a > ticket where all SIGs comment on. The goal here is to make things clearly visible every step of the way. If there are better ways to do so I would appreciate knowing how. -- Stephen J Smoogen. "The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance." Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University. "Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle." -- Ian MacLaren _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
