On 03/02/2011 04:07 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > So, my strong opinion is that we do not require any explicit signing of > this, instead we note that it's the case for "everyone who is using > Fedora project resources". Agreed. What's the purpose of explicit requiring signing of COCE if the biggest question of them all still remains unanswered. . . If we take the worst possible outcome and we have to expel one of our own what's preventing him to return under a new *online* entity Today we expelled "John" and tomorrow he returns to the community as "Jane".. . . It only comes logical that if you got corporate entity and it's managers breathing down your neck, effectively preventing you from expressing yourself freely you work around that by creating alternative identity untraceable by that corporate entity and it's managers and for various other reasons. Having several on-line identities is actually coming very common these days and generally worldwide accepted thanks to Corporates + privacy issues, Facebook and other social networking sites where it's common that people create 3 separates accounts one for family, one for work and one for friends hence I would not be surprised if some people exist under multiple identities already within our community on irc, mailing lists etc. and express themselves differently depending on which mask they wear that day.. So it's ilogical to require any explicit signing of anything if you cant enforce that agreement should someone break it.. JBG _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
