CWG thanks for the hard work! Thumbs up for the conduct - not so happy with the enforcement draft ;) On 03/02/2011 02:40 AM, Brian Pepple wrote: > * Final decision takes place here. As far as i understood the CWG was a temporary *working* group of *appointed* group members. Not a enforcing group. To have a clear conduct is very helpful to have a common ground to deal with things - if things can not solved "at the lowest level first" - i propose, let the certain Steering Commitees and Groups deal with conduct violation - like as example here http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors/dispute_resolution If things are so wrong that it comes to exclude members from the whole Project - the FPL and Board as a elected body should be involved and do the decission making. cu Joerg -- Joerg (kital) Simon jsimon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JoergSimon http://kitall.blogspot.com Key Fingerprint: 3691 0989 2DCA 58A2 8D1F 2CAC C823 558E 5B5B 5688
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
