Re: Fedora Board Recap 2011-02-21

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Montag, den 21.02.2011, 16:10 -0800 schrieb Toshio Kuratomi:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:00:11AM +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 21.02.2011, 17:29 -0500 schrieb Jon Stanley:
> > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Maybe I'm misreading this, but this seems like it would be more simply
> > > > stated as "the wallpaper used on spins is determined by the Design Team".
> > > 
> > > They have that authority, yes. In this particular instance, if the
> > > Design Team proves to be unwilling or unable to render a decision, it
> > > will be kicked up to the Board. 
> > 
> > IIRC at FUDCon we agreed that  the spins SIG and the spin maintainers
> > should have a stronger mandate, right? And now it's on the design-team
> > or the board to decide about the wallpapers of individual spins?
> > 
> > Don't get me wrong: I would like us to use a common artwork to
> > strengthen the Fedora brand, but in the end it should IMHO be up to the
> > maintainers. I mean, if I am not mistaken the GNOME upstream wallpaper
> > will be used anyway in the desktop spin, right?
> >
> ATM, the design team is in charge of deciding what wallpaper will be used on
> the desktop spin.

Thanks for the clarification, Bill said they were in charge of "the
spins" (plural).

Regards,
Christoph


_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux