On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Chris Tyler <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Greetings! > > I would like to ask the board (in consultation with FESCo as > appropriate) for to develop guidelines for the escalation of a secondary > arch to primary arch status. Obviously, there have been situations where > demotion from primary to secondary has occurred, and at this time there > are no secondary archs in a position to be escalated to primary arch > status, but it would be useful to know what criteria would be used to > evaluate such a proposal. > > I recommend that some combination of... > - maturity/completeness of the secondary arch effort, > - installed user base, > - current hardware availability, > - downstream interest, and > - preparedness of infra to handle the arch > ...be utilized as the criteria. > > Thank you for considering this request-- I started working on this two months ago[1] and have a proposed set of criteria. There has been, uh, "limited" feedback though. I think we should come up with a set of criteria on the secondary list and then present it to FESCo. josh [1] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/secondary/2010-December/000100.html _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
