On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 09:52 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Have you talked with the Desktop sig on their plans? They started to > move to a 1GB image a while back, then reverted it. I see no reason to > force a decision on them... why not let them decide what size is best > for their offering? Came up just yesterday - http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/desktop/2011-January/006723.html (see follow-ups). > One final question here... why is this going to the Board? > Isn't this a more technical detail that would be suited for FESCo to > decide? (after all, they decided to drop split cd install media, should > the Board decide that instead). Yeah, I agree this is probably FESCo material. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
