On 01/10/2011 10:51 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 01/10/2011 03:10 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> Heck, large chunks of Fedora's own infrastructure run on RHEL. > > Is there any particular reason why we are doing that? > > Does it not discredits Fedora as a viable server platform if we do that? > > Honestly should we be eating our own dog food and all that? We do this because the lifecycle of Fedora is not compatible with providing and maintaining a long life hosting infrastructure. Does that mean that Fedora is not an ideal platform for server deployments lasting longer than a year and a half? Yes, in my humble opinion. Don't get me wrong, the lifecycle of Fedora is great for many things, but the lifecycle of RHEL is far more appropriate for our hosting and infrastructure needs. ~tom == Fedora Project _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
