On Thursday, December 16, 2010 03:39:33 pm Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 01:13:37AM +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > Am Montag, den 06.12.2010, 15:26 -0500 schrieb Tom Callaway: > > > - The Board suggests that it may have done a poor job communicating the > > > decided target audience. > > > > BTW: Did the board come up with a definition? I can't find anything in > > the wiki. Is there anything beyond the 4 bullet points Paul mentioned in > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2009-October/msg003 > > 50.html > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User_base > > ...as was referenced in numerous Board meeting minutes over several > months during the process of exploring those points further. It's > also linked from our overview, vision, foundations, and objectives. Mo created Board blog [1] to communicate such information to broader audience - contributors and users. I'm not sure meetings minutes are enough, see meeting minutes from previous Board meeting ;-) Any better way how to handle this communication? Meeting minutes, fab list, blog - but how to really spread into the community? Contact related magazines, distro community blogs, etc.? Other ideas? R. [1] http://blogs.fedoraproject.org/wp/board/ -- Jaroslav ÅeznÃk <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx> Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno Office: +420 532 294 275 Mobile: +420 602 797 774 Red Hat, Inc. http://cz.redhat.com/ _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
