Also, something I've omitted just occurred to me in reading your response, and I should probably clarify it. Just so there's no misunderstanding, the motivation in forming this group is not to point fingers or "call someone out," over this election. Frankly, this was a "perfect storm" of things falling apart simultaneously, and what I envision this group to be is something akin to a state's "secretary of state's office" that facilitates elections.
No, it's not glamorous, and arguably it's very mundane in a "chop wood, carry water" kind of way. But it's vital to the operation of the Fedora Project.
Larry Cafiero
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Max Spevack <mspevack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Larry Cafiero wrote:Great start, Larry.
> Once a completed proposal is in place, I would like to approach the
> board at that time to gain its approval. In the meantime, I ask again
> that those interested in forming an administrative body to oversee
> elections contribute to the proposal.
On the less logistical side, I'd propose that FEMA take care of some
form of institutional knowledege:
Clear docs for setting up a townhall meeting, and strategies for making
sure that hour of time is successful. Politely pushing people to answer
questions, the moderator being fair but also having the ability to ask
followup questions that make sense, etc.
--Max
_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
_______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
