On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 10:09 -0500, Eric "Sparks" Christensen wrote: > > Do you use SQLninja for penetration testing? Had you heard of it before? > > What penetration testing tools do you use? Is the language they use to > > explain & advertise their tools similar to that used for SQLninja? How > > do you find out about penetration testing tools? How many of the ones > > you use are GPL? > > So the problem is that it can be used to hack into a system and isn't > passive like Nessus (is this really passive?), nmap, telnet (the > client), airsnort, and wireshark, just to name a few? I asked a series of questions; I didn't assert anything. > >> 2) Some board members appear to have raised legal concerns. However > >> those were not made explicit in the minutes and it looks like there has > >> not been an analysis or ruling from Fedora Legal. Before the board > >> ruled, the add package request (bug #63402) was blocked on FE-LEGAL, > >> but it looks like the board voted to deny the request before hearing > >> from FE-LEGAL. Moreover, I cannot find any place where the legal > >> concerns are articulated, let alone reference to particular statute or > >> justification for a concern. > > > > I took the meeting minutes. Generally sensitive discussion is excluded > > from meeting minutes. > > So are you saying this was a legal issue? I am saying what I am saying. ~m _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
