> 5. Why does board apply higher standards for hosting, testing, > artwork and trademark approval than for any other spin that was > ever approved? Here was my biggest concern. I want Fedora Ambassadors handing out something that is produced by the Project as a whole, not by an incredibly clever individual who had a good idea. While we can argue semantics of "is this a spin or not?" the fact remains that by handing it out at Fedora booths at events, as Ambassadors, in the recepient's mind, they are getting a Fedora install media. As such, it should be of high quality, and represent the best that Fedora can produce. I'd like to think that the media produced in the past has met this same level of scrutiny, as part of the standard release process we've had in place since before it was called Fedora. It feels like extra burden only because the idea sprouted quite late in the release process schedule, such that the standard methods and levels of scrutiny, which are normally applied by many people over months, was requested to be done over hours or days. I'm hoping this begins a constructive conversation about what we would ideally like to hand out to people at events, representing the Project's best efforts, given the newly relaxed constraint that we've got 9GB to work with now instead of ~4.3GB. I thank you for doing the research to show that financially, double-layer media is now affordable, and for proving one method that can take advantage of this relaxed constraint. Thanks, Matt _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
