On 11/10/2010 05:26 PM, Miloslav TrmaÄ wrote: > The majority of growth in Red Hat contributions is developers and QA > (AFAIK for a long time there was only one person working full-time on > Fedora QA, now the situation is much different); You must be referring to Will rather then Jeremy here and the only reason in increased QA employment surge from Red Hat is because Will manage to sell his dream pony ( AutoQA which is a win win for everybody btw ) and at the same time convince upper level management of Red Hat of the benefits of strong Fedora QA treatment on the bits before they reach RHEL. I dont know how much of a history lesson you are given at Red Hat when you sign up but I suggest you take of your QE glasses ( QE!=QA ) study the history between Red Hat and Fedoraunity even after they literally saved the official GA release which was what FC5 or FC6 ( Anaconda installing the wrong kernel arch for those that dont remember that screw up ) amongst all the good work unity does and the reason why bug-zapper ( which in it's current form is more or less on John Poelstra and Jon Stanley work if I can recall correctly ) are on it's own channel on freenode ( they used to be on the QA channel ) and as I pointed them out when they were making the 3 attempt to get triages up and running that it would not solve the underlying issue ( which it has not up today ) then perhaps you start seeing things a bit from community perspective . > paradoxically asking > Red Hat for more manpower in community organizing implicitly means that > Red Hat should have_more_ control of Fedora. Why? How much control would I get if I pour $1 $10 $100 $1000 $100000 $1000000? JBG _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
