Am 10.11.2010 16:43, schrieb Bruno Wolff III: > I think it is reasonable to ask, why the ambassadors need a private list. this was a topic several times in the past since start of the Ambassador Group http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ambassadors/2008-September/007596.html which lead us over some steps into the process that we have today https://fedorahosted.org/fama/wiki/mentoring > If there is a reason, it should be prominently documented. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ambassadors "This is a private list for Fedora Ambassadors. To learn how to become a Fedora Ambassador, see Fedora Project Wiki page." > If there isn't > a good reason, maybe this policy should be reconsidered. -- Joerg (kital) Simon jsimon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JoergSimon http://kitall.blogspot.com Key Fingerprint: 3691 0989 2DCA 58A2 8D1F 2CAC C823 558E 5B5B 5688
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
