On 11/09/2010 11:13 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: >> Would it be granted equal amount of seats to appoint members or more that is >> if it funded more and would it have the rights to appoint the veto member ( >> FPL )? > If we were to have a sponsor of equivalent stature to Red Hat, > undoubtedly as terms of such sponsorship (or really membership if to > be considered equal), the layout of the Board and privileges would get > re-evaluated. Given no one is stepping forward to offer several $M > US, I don't want to travel too far down this hypothetical scenario. Hum not following you're reasoning here I would think the layout of the board and privileges would need to exist before hand but not get re-evaluated afterwards for those wanting to become members equivalent stature to Red Hat and willing to aid in future grow of the project. I would say that those considering if they should start pouring water in their own pool or simply just put on a bathing suit and apply for a membership and jump into our existing one wont since the layout for the board does not exist for them and we do not publicly share the number of $ Red Hat is spending into the project ( or any other sponsor for that matter ) on yearly bases ( as far as I know ) which I'm pretty sure we need to make public ( that is if we dont already ) if we are open for new members equivalent stature to Red Hat to joining the project. Is my logic flawed? JBG _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
