2010/10/27 Máirín Duffy <duffy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > We sort of said this in the discussion on this list before the board > meeting minutes we're discussing and were met with a lot of protest. People were thinking that "oh, no, the Board is being the blocker here, they won't let us go forward with this", when in actuality, the thought process was more of "we don't think that anyone is going to have the time to do this, but if they do, more power to them, and let's prevent this from happening in the future". The second part is the rationale for implementing and then waiving the schedule requirements - the Board wanted to allow plenty of time for resource allocation within rel-eng (or a decision that a resource would not be allocated, we can't compel rel-eng to do anything). However, it seemed slightly unfair to create an ex post facto policy about scheduling and say "well, you didn't meet X schedule, so you're out!". I hope that makes things slightly clearer. _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
