Am Dienstag, den 19.10.2010, 00:09 -0700 schrieb Jesse Keating: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/19/2010 12:01 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > Am Montag, den 18.10.2010, 20:35 -0700 schrieb Jesse Keating: > > > >> There is not going to be a TC2. We are moving on to RC. > > > > Is this process documented in the wiki somewhere? > > http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-14/f-14-releng-tasks.html > is probably the best place, which was linked to from > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Schedule The list only memtions the Tc, but nether TC1 and TC2 not the fact that TC2 does not include live media. > >> It is FAR too > >> late to be introducing technology that needs to be tested and planned > >> for at this stage in the release cycle. > > > > The only thing that needs testing is the boot menu. The rest is taken > > care of by the normal spins/desktop testing we already do and did. > > That's still something that needs testing, needs a testing plan, needs > coordination. Not something that can easily be slapped together in the > less than one week since the concept became visible here. What is there to test for a boot menu? What would a test plan look like. Boot all menu entries and you are done. > >> I still haven't seen any plan for how to handle our source obligation. > > > > I cannot give you a plan if nobody outlines the obligations to me. > > You need to speak to Fedora legal to figure out what your obligations are. I have written them but no reply so far. > > Why is the DVD different than the other spins? > > All the other things the project produces are made available on the > website in binary form, alongside the source. It is not clear to me if > your combined media set will be made available online in any way. In my first email I wrote: > > Given that [...] > > * we have download location for the image on Fedora > > infrastructure > > * we put a readme on the spin whith the download location of > > the SRPMs Is there anything unclear about it? > It is > not clear to me if a binary aggregate of all the spins can be satisfied > by the sources we have online. It is not clear to me what method of > GPLv2 source obligations you will be using when distributing these > binary offerings. This sounds a little vague to me. Can you please outline your concerns a little deeper? AFAICS they apply to the other spins too as they also have a boot menu. What is the difference between shipping 8 single media and one dual layer DVD? The only difference is the boot menu. Please correct me if I'm wrong, Christoph _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
