I would certainly hope that permission isn't really needed, since marketing has been wanting to do this for about a year, and packaging on limesurvey has been ongoing as part of this process. Nobody has yet said that I ought to go get permission from the board before we actually -do- it and I've pretty heavily advertised my intent. It's pretty much been the "next thing on the plate" after getting fedora insight out the door. On 9/1/10, Jon Stanley <jonstanley@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 7:34 PM, inode0 <inode0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> What is preventing you from just going off and doing it now? I hope >> you find encouragement but I also hope the board doesn't get in the >> business of issuing mandates. > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but I read what Jon was looking for as more > of permission than a mandate of "you SHALL do this" - obviously he > already wants to. I think we should give encouragement to this, > because I think the data is extraordinarily valuable. Also, he > mentioned that there are outside companies that could be contracted to > do this - implying a financial cost. While the board has no finances > as such to direct, we can certainly say to CommArch or more directly > Fedora Engineering (as anyone else can) that we think this is a > valuable use of money. > > Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong :) > _______________________________________________ > advisory-board mailing list > advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board > -- Sent from my mobile device _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
