On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, Jesse Keating wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 8/17/10 10:16 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > >> > My what a paranoid view you have. > >> > > >> > Also, I rather take offense that you consider a more conservative > >> > approach to updates to our stable releases counter to the "roots" of > >> > Fedora, particularly when you consider that Fedora is rooted in Red Hat > >> > Linux. > >> > > > Thanks for being excelllent! > > > > I'm sorry, I'm trying to be excellent, however I cannot put myself in > your shoes to see your viewpoint. > I'm a little confused too. I don't see anyone from FESCo saying they'd like to do X but haven't been allowed to because of the board. But I'm not sure if that's what he's advocating or not. Some of the positions Toshio has taken seems to say he'd prefer to see FESCo be the exception to our normal organizational structure in that it shouldn't report to the board (unlike all the other bodies). I could be wrong. Toshio, would you mind maybe re-stating what you're proposing from an org chart view? Or maybe correct me if I'm completely misreading you. Email is the worst possible format for discussions like these :( -Mike _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
