Re: Response to "Getting Fedora Out of the If-Then Loop"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 18:51 +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote:
> 
> Interesting. As the KDE SIG decided (IIRC it was pointed out that we
> need that) that we do better QA for the KDE Desktop spin, i sent a
> mail to the list introduced myself and applied for the QA group in
> FAS. I still wait to get approved for QA. I dont want to say it's
> because of KDE is not part of the QA work that's going on. I just want
> to show that it's frustrating to want to do the work, already doing
> the work (as possible), but not getting applied. 

You don't have to be in the QA group to do QA tasks.  In fact, we
haven't come up with a good use of the group mechanics yet.

Are you failing to find information at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Join on things to work on?

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux