2010/2/19 Máirín Duffy <duffy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Hi Thomas, > > On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 16:40 +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote: >> Sorry. But reading a lot of you GNOME/Desktop guys, and especially you >> here, it comes down to (at least for me) "i'm afraid of losing my >> default status and/or i have no idea about the other side so i will do >> everything that the situation stays as it is". Poor. > > 1) I am not a guy. Looks like my english is really too bad. I thought you say that "you guys" even with girls involved. > 3) We're talking about a difference between 20+ Fedora folks working > full-time on GNOME vs I believe 5 or less for each of the other > desktops. As I said, these are not transferrable resources. Get's me a picture of how awesome our works is. But anyways. I'm glad that i'm reading someone who decides at RH who works on what. >> > There's a reality here that's not being acknowledged, and it has little >> > to do with popularity. I hope folks who work on XFCE or KDE in Fedora >> > don't come into those projects with the expectation that the same amount >> > of resources are dedicated to those as the desktop spin - because that's >> > never been true, and I sure hope they've not been misled into thinking >> > so. >> >> Well, gladly there are other projects where things like that just >> works. For example openSUSE. >> >> But i would be interested in what you think what will happen with >> Fedora if all the unwanted (it sounds exactly like that to me) >> developers leave and Fedora is left behind with only GNOME? >> Is that your perfect future? > > Who said any developers were unwanted? > > What a logical leap! Not at all. All you get back here is the impression you made. But i see. -- LG Thomas Dubium sapientiae initium _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
