On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 12:02:10AM +0100, Gerold Kassube wrote: > I'm also a bit wondering ... > > Is that request a "approval" or a "acceptance" question? > > Regards > > Gerold much confused atm The current FAmSCo rules say "ratification by the Board," but I think we can get by with less formal process. Honestly, the best scenario is that someone on the FAmSCo sends a note to this list and the Ambassadors list, notifying everyone about the chair selection. Unless the Board has a serious concern about it, that selection should stand -- and it's hard to imagine the circumstances in which that would happen. I talked to Joerg a bit this morning about removing the requirement for a formal ratification. There have been some recent clarifications drafted on the FAMSCo election page and it should be easy to add this change. Joerg, you can go ahead and announce this selection to the Ambassadors, and consider that announcement done from the perspective of this list. :-) -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
