On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Paul W. Frields wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Meeting:Board_meeting_2009-12-17 == Roll Call == * '''Present:''' Paul Frields, Christopher Aillon, Josh Boyer, Dimitris Glezos, Bill Nottingham, John Poelstra, Jon McCann, Tom "spot" Callaway, Matt Domsch, Mike McGrath, Dennis Gilmore == Last meeting == https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Meeting:Board_meeting_2009-12-10 == Updates/Installs presentation == * William Jon McCann -- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JonMccann * Co-presenter: Christopher Aillon ** pointed back to whiteboard link: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Desktop/Whiteboards/UpdateExperience with new added "Impact" section with information from stakeholders ** document doesn't present implementation, but records opinions garnered from current contributors and stakeholders * General Board consensus is that we do need to establish criteria for updates, and empower FESCo to enforce them * Lots of spirited discussion around various details of the proposal, with conversation that covered a lot of different issues but the Board is not ready to issue hard guidance yet ** Unclear to what extent current pending changes (NFR, AutoQA) will impact any Fedora user's update experience, or how these changes are currently incorporated in the whiteboard ** The whiteboard correctly identifies several problems but it's not clear that it completely lists root causes
Why was the above discussion brought to the board anyone? Instead of fesco?
-sv _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
