On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 05:59:55AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 08:37:29PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > >On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 20:10 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > >> Or perhaps more informatively, in the beginning, the OS was probably the > >> sole reason for the existence of the Fedora Project. But as time has gone > >> on we've gotten bigger and things have started to change. The OS is what a > >> significant number of contributors want to work on. But there's people > >> working on numerous other things under the Fedora Umbrella now too. CSI is > >> something you're working on, mirrormanager is something mdomsch is working > >> on, fedora-classroom is something that nirik is working on, the latam > >> ambassadors are interested in working on a moodle instance.... Lot's of > >> code and content is being worked on that's only indirectly related to the > >> putting together of the OS. > > > > > >One might classify the OS as a delivery mechanism for the majority of > >our other endeavors. > > Agree. Or in the case of mirrormanager, it is the delivery mechansim _for_ > the OS. I don't consider the relationship there to be indirect at all. > In mirrormanager's case, the project is becoming the delivery mechanism for projects other than Fedora. So it's no longer just a case of us designing software to deliver Fedora. It's become we're the major contributors to an upstream project that we use to deliver Fedora. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgp83Jsju0c1b.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
