John Poelstra (poelstra@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > I completely agree with you and think this issue should be > addressed. I had a similar experience when a new MediaWiki update > was added to Fedora 10 which required going to the command line, > copying some files around and then running a script to update the > database schema. This did not meet my expectations of an update to > a stable release either. > > As much as I would like the board to address this issue I want to be > careful that this is an issue that the board should be deciding. In > the past we have tried to be careful about not taking on issues that > are FESCo's responsibility. Since this has to do specifically with > packaging issues and how/when/where those packages are released this > issue might actually belong to FESCo. > > What are the views of other members of FESCo or the board? I suspect it's the purview of the board to set goals such that FESCo can make policies that implement these goals. Bill _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
