On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 09:06 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > > Have FESCo look at requiring approval for major version updates in the > middle of a release or possibly banning them outright. This also has a > side effect of fewer updates which many find desirable. This may end up > working on the honor system but should be possible while not compromising > our first mission objective. > > This could also be coupled with the experimental repo mentioned above to > bring new packages to stable releases but only to those who accept the > potential consequences and have enabled such a repo. This is what updates-testing is for. If it doesn't work in updates-testing, you can just drop it on the floor. The problem is when it gets promoted from -testing to updates. We do /not/ want a third repo here, that makes the logistics balloon out of control. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
