Re: Beta packages within stable releases

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 10 Oct 2009, Ken Chilton wrote:
There used to be a practice in all things Linux where even-numbered release numbers implied stable releases, where
odd-numbered releases were development tracks.  The Linux kernel follows such a scheme, with 2.4.x and 2.6.x being the
(more) stable.

*Did follow such a scheme, but no longer. There is no 2.7.x for kinky development thingies for 2.8.x like there was 2.5.x for kinky 2.6.x development thingies, afaik.

-- Jeroen

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux