On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Honestly the discussion we're having on F-A-B right now is a major > distraction to the who is fedora for topic of which is my primary concern. > There doesn't seem to be any consensus among the Board, most have remained > quiet until a scheduled meeting so my hopes of any actual change are > quickly vanishing. Which is totally fine. The problem I'm trying to > solve is arguments and future planning being done by those who shout the > loudest or longest. Lots of different engineers pulling Fedora in > different directions instead of having us all work towards one direction. > I seem to be in an incredible minority in thinking this. Wow, talk about disconnect. From the glimpse I get into the board's business I thought the "What is Fedora?" initiative had a lot of traction and was basically a done deal aside from sorting out the details. And I thought all this stuff being discussed here was part of that sorting out process. Thanks for succinctly restating the point you had in mind though. John _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
