On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 00:24:42 -0400 Pamela Chestek <pchestek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Scott Glaser wrote on 09/18/2009 08:17 PM: > > On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:41:56 -0400 > > Pamela Chestek <pchestek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > >> Scott Glaser wrote on 09/17/2009 08:29 AM: > >> > >>> Is there not a way to put in a statement that "At the Licensors > >>> discretion some registration fees my be reimbursed based on > >>> terminating the contract under favorable terms." > >>> > >>> > >> Thanks for the suggestion. I've amended the agreement to add at the > >> end of Paragraph 3 these sentences: "Unless the Agreement was > >> terminated under Paragraph 3(a), at Licensor's discretion Licensor > >> may reimburse terminating Licensee for reasonable domain name > >> registration fees. There will be no reimbursement available if the > >> Agreement was terminated under Paragraph 3(a)." You can see the > >> addition on the wiki page. > >> > >> Pam > >> > > > > Pam, > > > > I believe that you meant the addition to paragraph 3 to read as > > listed below: > > > > Unless the Agreement was terminated under Paragraph 3(a), at > > Licensor's discretion Licensor may reimburse terminating Licensee > > for reasonable domain name registration fees. There will be no > > reimbursement available if the Agreement was terminated under > > Paragraph 3(b). Licensee agrees to remove any Web Pages content > > immediately if in Licensor's sole discretion such removal is > > warranted. > > > > V/R > > > > Scott Glaser > > > > > > > > > If I'm reading correctly that you changed the second 3(a) to 3(b), I > meant it the original way. With just the first sentence, the "unless" > clause creates an ambiguous situation - what happens if it IS > terminated under 3(a)? So the second sentence was added to explain - > if it's terminated under 3(a) (material breach), you're out of luck. > Under 3(b), it might be a situation where it would be fair to pay for > the domain name, for example if it was a trademark infringement claim > against "Fedora," which wouldn't be your fault. > > If it's not clear, though, I'd welcome any suggestion to improve the > language. > > Pam > Pam, Sorry for the delay, but somehow this got snatched up by my spam filter. But Upon you explanation I re-read that section and realized I misread that entire portion. To me that verbage looks correct and good at this point. I was hoping more people would have interest in this document, however it does not appear that way. I will re-read the document one more time to ensure that I see no other obvious issue and let you know if I have any more suggestions. Thanks for you time this far in responding to our concerns. V/R Scott Glaser _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
