On 08/23/2009 09:33 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 08/23/2009 09:49 PM, Thomas Janssen wrote: >> 2009/8/22 Máirín Duffy <mairin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> >>> How is Fedora KDE not a part of this design? Fedora KDE will have a site >>> all its own that users can be directed to. >> >> Do we have a Fedora GNOME page where all it's users can be directed to as well? > > It isn't required because the default download will include GNOME. If > GNOME developers want it, let them ask for it. Why are you worried about it? > Actually... If I've understood mizmo's mockups correctly, there will be a Fedora GNOME page (but called the Fedora Desktop or whatever the name is). Conceptually, the fact that Fedora GNOME is also the livecd that is downloaded via get.fpo is supposed to be beside the fact in this design. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
