On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 21:07 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> > We *should* make the transition from the dominant operating
> > systems today as painless as possible. This does mean that we
> > should offer defaults. But not at the expense of putting other
> > alternatives behind a door.
>
> I disagree that having a default option and an 'others' option is
> putting the non-default options behind a door. Please explain why you
> feel this is the case.
>
> The loudest critiques of the new design are hailing open suse as the way
> to go:
>
> http://software.opensuse.org/
>
> Looking at this screen, I see no mention of GNOME or KDE? How is this
> screen giving me a choice of default desktops? Can someone fill me in as
> to what is going on here? Has the new design not debuted yet, or
> something?
>
I believe it's been decided on but won't be implemented until their next
release.
-Mike
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
