A brief update on the Hall Monitor policy. To date, we have sent two official warnings. One was for a comment in bugzilla, the other was for comments on the fedora-devel-list. The first case went away quietly, and the person being warned replied and acknowledged and has not had any further action. The second case resulted in a reply about censorship, and further negative comments were made in the original thread. That resulted in two actions. 1) That person was moderated for 3 days starting last August 14. 2) The thread itself was moderated due to further commentary that was not productive. The moderated person did not post again to fedora-devel-list over the weekend, and is no longer moderated as of Aug 17. The thread itself remains moderated. I approved two acceptable posts to it over the weekend. All of this is archived in the moderators mailing list, per policy. At this point, I can't say whether the policy is helping the tone of the lists or not. There have been a few threads that have gotten testy since we implemented it but I think the overall frequency of those is a bit less. The actual policy itself seems to be working, as unfortunate as it's necessity is. josh _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
