Re: Follow-up on Extended Life Cycle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/21/2009 04:14 PM, Dimitris Glezos wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Bill Nottingham<notting@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
Greg DeKoenigsberg (gdk@xxxxxxxxxx) said:
I'm guessing that this 1 fulltime person in a security response team
role is to track, monitor, and coordinate the issues that need to be
addressed. Which in many cases is different from the devel, releng and
test aspects - necessitating much more than 1 fulltime person's worth
of work to pull off the broader initiative. Â Right?
In the world of RHEL, this would certainly be true -- but in the world of
Fedora?
Note that also there are likely to be *more* issues to track in Fedora
than in RHEL; after all, Fedora is much larger.

Is it necessary to go all-or-nothing, or is there a smart and simple
way to only issue updates for a subset of Fedora's packages (eg. the
ones that are shipped on the DVD for example)?


This is a dead end and is *not* going to happen.

-- Jeroen

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux